English Language Support in Irish Post-Primary Schools - Policy, challenges and deficits
              This report presents the results  of our survey of current practice. Between June 2007 and September 2008 Zachary  Lyons interviewed 85 language support teachers and coordinators in 70 post-primary  schools, some of them on more than three occasions. The purpose of the survey 
was to elicit information on the  organization and delivery of English language support and to canvas teachers’  views on the specific challenges that they must respond to and the deficiencies  in the system that they must overcome. 
              The survey findings do not make  encouraging reading. In many of the schools represented the 
                provision of English language  support was poorly coordinated; in some it was downright haphazard. 
              Effective and sustained  communication between language support and subject teachers seemed to be a  rarity, and in some cases responsibility for the integration of newcomer  students fell entirely on the language support teacher. There was a widespread  tendency to take a “deficit” 
                view of newcomer students’ lack  of proficiency in English and to assume that they belonged in the same category  as students with special educational needs. 
              In the view of the teachers  surveyed, these inadequacies of provision and understanding were not helped by  serious deficiencies in the system. They identified lack of appropriate teacher  training, pre- as well as in-service, as the single most significant deficiency,  closely followed by a lack of English language teaching materials that take  account of the demands of the different curriculum subjects. Only 57% of the  teachers surveyed declared themselves happy with the progress their newcomer  students were making. 
              The policy response of the  Department of Education and Science to the English language needs 
                of newcomer students reflects  little knowledge of the realities of language learning. In particular, the DES seems wholly unaware  that for the past thirty years international research has distinguished between  the basic interpersonal communication skills required for social interaction  and the cognitive/academic language processing required in education. Until the  DES forges a more flexible policy that takes account of international research  findings, large numbers of newcomer students in our post-primary schools will  continue to be at serious risk of educational failure. 
               
  Download the Executive Summary 
  
  Download the entire Report 
               
 
              
   |